This article discusses the trade-offs associated with study designs that involve random assignment of students within schools and describes the experience from one such study of Teach For America (TFA).
Related Content
Related Publications for National Evaluation of Teach For America
-
Random Assignment Within Schools: Lessons Learned from the Teach For America ExperimentApr 30, 2012
-
Alternative Routes to Teaching: The Impacts of Teach For America on Student Achievement and Other OutcomesJan 30, 2006
Based on a randomized experiment to study the impact of Teach For America on student achievement and other outcomes, the authors find that TFA teachers had a positive impact on math achievement and no impact on reading achievement.
-
Quality in the Classroom: How Does Teach For America Measure Up?Aug 30, 2004
This four-page issue brief summarizes findings from Mathematica's evaluation of Teach For America. The researchers found that TFA teachers outperformed non-TFA teachers in the same schools in math and achieved the same results in reading.
-
The Effects of Teach For America on Students: Findings from a National Evaluation (Working Paper)Jul 30, 2004
Students of Teach For America teachers outscored their schoolmates on math achievement tests, and matched their average performance in reading, according to the findings from the first national evaluation of the impact of TFA teachers on student learning.
-
Public Use Files from the National Evaluation of Teach For AmericaJun 09, 2004
These files from Mathematica’s large-scale random assignment study are for public use by the research community.
-
The Effects of Teach For America on Students: Findings from a National EvaluationJun 09, 2004
Students of Teach For America teachers outscored their schoolmates on math achievement tests, and matched their average performance in reading, according to the findings from the first national evaluation of the impact of TFA teachers on student learning.